God So Loved the World: A Christology for Disciples


Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online God So Loved the World: A Christology for Disciples file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with God So Loved the World: A Christology for Disciples book. Happy reading God So Loved the World: A Christology for Disciples Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF God So Loved the World: A Christology for Disciples at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF God So Loved the World: A Christology for Disciples Pocket Guide.


Navigation menu

And whosoever doth not bear his cross, and come after me, cannot be my disciple. For which of you, intending to build a tower, sitteth not down first, and counteth the cost, whether he have sufficient to finish it? Lest haply, after he hath laid the foundation, and is not able to finish it, all that behold it begin to mock him, Saying, This man began to build, and was not able to finish. Or what king, going to make war against another king, sitteth not down first, and consulteth whether he be able with ten thousand to meet him that cometh against him with twenty thousand?

Or else, while the other is yet a great way off, he sendeth an ambassage, and desireth conditions of peace. So likewise, whosoever he be of you that forsaketh not all that he hath, he cannot be my disciple. The Jesus of John is very different. He is totally lacking the passion, the humanity that is abundantly found in the Jesus of the Synoptics. Instead, the Jesus of John is described as a superhuman embodiment of God itself. Unlike in the Syntopics, the whole atmosphere of the gospel of John is repressed, ethereal, supernal, eerie.

And unlike the Jesus of the Synoptics, the Jesus of John promoted a lifestyle of obedience and submission in light of the authorities of his day. And I give unto them eternal life ; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand. My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all; and no man is able to pluck them out of my Father's hand. I and my Father are one. If one wants an authentic record of what Jesus actually did and said, the nearest he can come to it is in the Synoptics. The gospel of John, on the other hand, obviously contains more interpretation and mythology than history.

For reasons that go beyond the scope of this question, it is not the Jesus of the Synoptic Gospels but the Jesus of the Gospel of John that carries the greatest weight in how Christians perceive the historical Jesus. However, it is blatantly obvious in any rational approach that the gospel of John is far less reliable as a source on the historical Jesus than the Synoptic Gospels.

No, Yeshua never explicitly says he is the son of God. He also never, ever says he is God nor does anyone else. The closest verse that comes to an explicit statement is John Say ye of him, whom the Father hath sanctified, and sent into the world, Thou blasphemest; because I said , I am the Son of God? This was not a claim to divinity. Yeshua was asking why the Jews were so angry at him just because he said he is a son of God. The Jews had misunderstood something he said earlier Jesus answered them, Many good works have I shewed you from my Father; for which of those works do ye stone me?

The Jews answered him, saying, For a good work we stone thee not; but for blasphemy; and because that thou, being a man, makest thyself God. Rather than explain to the Jews that he is the triune god incarnated in the flesh or whatnot, Yeshua responds If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came , and the scripture cannot be broken;. Say ye of him, whom the Father hath sanctified, and sent into the world, Thou blasphemest; because I said, I am a Son of God? But if I do, though ye believe not me, believe the works: that ye may know, and believe, that the Father is in me, and I in him.

Yeshua says that even God called mere men, those who received the word of God, gods; so he didn't understand why they were so upset that he said "A son of God I am". Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site the association bonus does not count. Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead? Home Questions Tags Users Unanswered. Does Jesus ever claim to be God, or the son of God? Ask Question. Related: How do we know Jesus was God incarnate?

One thing to keep in mind is that during the time of Jesus, there were many false messiahs. Part of the reason for the skepticism of the Pharisees and the Sadducees was that they'd seen messiahs before. PeterTurner It took me a whole day to get that joke. Just for the sake of historical record I'd like it to be known that this question has been edited to say "literally", and not by me. This edit, however, is probably an improvement and I'll actually take answers for this better question rather than my original one, and re-accept the top voted answer. Thanks to all for your input on this! It would be interesting to me to see this question broken up with the first part being claims of Jesus about himself being God I'm not sure that one is possible with the second part being Jesus claiming to be the Son of God I think this part is fairly easy.


  • Christology, Church, on-line church, Exeter Church,.
  • Related Products;
  • My Road!
  • RTI: Assessments & Remediation for K–2.
  • Early Buddhist Monachism: 600 BC - 100 BC: Volume 24 (Trubners Oriental Series).
  • Семь воронов (перевод П.Н. Полевого) (Russian Edition).

As it is, the answers seem to mix freely between Jesus' direct claims about himself and other various other claims and proofs, which is a shame. There are many occasions on which Jesus states his identity with God. Matthew Jesus claims to forgive sins, which the local officials correctly believed to be the perogative of God only.

See also Mt for point 5. Also, a high priest asks Jesus if He is indeed the "Son of the Blessed", in which He replies "I am" in Mark : But he remained silent and made no answer. There's a question regarding "why not directly " at christianity. Here is what Bible says on this: Jesus gets an answer from His disciples that He is Son of God and acknowledges it affirmatively.


  • Intervención Pedagógica en el Lenguaje (Monográficos nº 1) (Spanish Edition)?
  • Breaking Waves (Heart Waves Series Book 2)?
  • Browse more videos.
  • I. Jewish Concept of Messiah.

And in this verse, John clearly states that Jesus is true God. Seek forgiveness Seek forgiveness 5, 5 5 gold badges 29 29 silver badges 58 58 bronze badges. Jesus claimed both to be God and to be the Son of God. Jesus claimed that he is God. John NIV 28 I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; no one will snatch them out of my hand. John NIV what about the one whom the Father set apart as his very own and sent into the world?

The Apostles call Jesus " God. After making purification for sins, he sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high, John NIV 28 I give them eternal life , and they shall never perish; no one will snatch them out of my hand. John NASB 14 And the Word became flesh, and [k]dwelt among us, and we saw His glory, glory as of the only begotten from the Father, full of grace and truth. Notes One who is begotten is of same nature with the parent who begat.

Radz C. Brown Radz C. Brown 3, 1 1 gold badge 14 14 silver badges 38 38 bronze badges. I think this answer deserves to be first. Great biblical support of multiple different points. Brown - I'm with Strasser. Steve Steve 6, 24 24 silver badges 48 48 bronze badges. There are at least 17 references to Jesus as the "Son of God" in the Gospels. Jesus either claims, affirms, accepts, or is quoted as claiming the title "Son of God" in each case. This also doesn't include some of the Gospel writer's claims rather than spoken claims, such as Mark Sorted by instigator: A.

Himself: Matthew , Luke , John , , , , Note: this includes what He affirms, claims, and what others quote Him as claiming B. An angel: Luke C.

God So Loved the World: A Christology for Disciples

Demons: Mark , Luke , Sorted by Gospel reference: Matthew , , , Mark , Luke , , , John , , , , , , The above offers a more systematic approach to the "Son of God" title. Jesus accepts the title "Lord" and "God" by Thomas in John Jesus claimed to be from heaven: John , , , , , Jesus claimed to be the source or giver of eternal life or life: John , , , , , , , , , , , , There are many other things that can be discussed, such as Jesus' claim that He will judge the world John , 27 , or Jesus accepting worship many times , which is certainly a claim to being God-like.

Alex Strasser Alex Strasser 1 1 silver badge 20 20 bronze badges. You should add 1 Timothy Daniel Giron Daniel Giron 2 2 silver badges 4 4 bronze badges. Richard Richard I think it's actually impossible for an English translation of whatever it was Jesus said in this passage not to be an interpretation on some level -- I think your rendition of the passage is a valid paraphrase and proper interpretation but somebody should be objecting to the very idea that "literal" makes any sense at all in the context of us discussing this in a different language rather than throwing out an answer that plays off the problematic question.

Caleb Let me see if I understand what you're saying The question does not define "literal". Also, instead of answering, based on one understanding of the word "literal", I should be challenging the OP's definition of the word "literal"?

Find in a library : God so loved the world : a christology for disciples

Wouldn't it be better to close the question than vote this answer down? I commented here in the first place to discuss whether this was even a valid question. I suspect not as proved by this answer. Your answer isn't valid because it hasn't answered the "real" question, only played hot potato and passed off the responsibility.

Or am I just crazy? Caleb Regarding the question, I don't think it's constructive , although I do think it's a valid question. It should be asked, but within a doctrinal framework. I'm starting to think I'm confused on the point you're making, though. Dick Harfield Dick Harfield Mark is not necessarily a denial of Jesus' divine status. It could also be read as a rhetorical question, saying, in essence, "If you call me 'good,' then you are calling me God.

So be aware of what you are saying when you say that.

At the Cross - Fountainview Academy - God so Loved the World

LeeWoofenden Thank you for your insight. You are correct that almost every passage in the Bible could be interpreted in more than one way. I spent several months looking at the issues of what Jesus called himself, what the disciples called him and what others called him, in Mark's Gospel. This answer is based on my conclusions. Somewhat undermining your thesis is Mark's first verse: "The beginning of the good news about Jesus the Messiah, the Son of God As I said, I don't rely on this Mk as interpolation but it completes the evidence that in the earliest gospel, the author was loathe to have Jesus or his followers refer to him as Son of God.

Something that changed a few years later, as we see in Matthew. John Slegers John Slegers 10 10 bronze badges. I am rather inclined to doubt that you have taken much care in your reading of the synoptic Gospels. And what's this? One minute you assert Jesus was an ascetic, the next minute he was similar to the s hippies..

Book Preview

Were they ascetics??!! Neither should we have any doubts about the reliability of the Gospel of John - John was, after all, one of the most prominent of the Apostles. AndrewShanks : I guess Gandhi is a better comparison than hippies in that regard. Anyway, there is no way that the Fourth Gospel was written by John Zebedee or by any of the disciples of Jesus. Many of its characters are literary creations and were never intended to be understood as real people.

And there is probably not a single word attributed to Jesus in this book that the real Jesus of actually spoke. This makes it, by far, the least reliable of the gospels. So you are convinced John's Gospel is essentially a legend, a myth. Whether we set forth truth or whether we expose error, and we can scarcely do…. As one stronghold of the opponents of the true and proper Sonship of the blessed…. This Scripture is a part…. Jesus Christ being fitted with…. The diagnosis is not very good: we are ignorant, guilty, and corrupt. As a litany….

Jesus Christ claims the incommunicable name-I Am Ex. The name signifies unchangeable…. It is the purpose of this article to make as clear as possible the conception…. We may well face at the outset the question so often asked: Is there any…. To glorify his dear Son has from all eternity been the purpose of the Father;….

God So Loved the World: A Christology for Disciples God So Loved the World: A Christology for Disciples
God So Loved the World: A Christology for Disciples God So Loved the World: A Christology for Disciples
God So Loved the World: A Christology for Disciples God So Loved the World: A Christology for Disciples
God So Loved the World: A Christology for Disciples God So Loved the World: A Christology for Disciples
God So Loved the World: A Christology for Disciples God So Loved the World: A Christology for Disciples
God So Loved the World: A Christology for Disciples God So Loved the World: A Christology for Disciples
God So Loved the World: A Christology for Disciples God So Loved the World: A Christology for Disciples
God So Loved the World: A Christology for Disciples God So Loved the World: A Christology for Disciples
God So Loved the World: A Christology for Disciples God So Loved the World: A Christology for Disciples

Related God So Loved the World: A Christology for Disciples



Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved