It owns the country's largest nut producer, AgReserves, Inc. Economic entrepreneurialism is actually part of Mormon doctrine — 88 of the revelations received by church founder Joseph Smith deal with fiscal matters. The church's entrepreneurial spirit has fostered some powerful Mormon businessmen, including presidential hopefuls Mitt Romney and Jon Huntsman, Jr.
Mormons hold a disproportionate number of top jobs at several major companies, including Marriott, American Express, Dell, Lufthansa, Fisher-Price, and Deloitte. The clean-cut optimism, honesty and family values of the Latter-day Saints also make them ideal politicians. In addition to Romney and Huntsman, 15 U.
The apparent incorruptibility of Mormons' moral righteousness make them ideal candidates for the nation's law enforcement and intelligence agencies. Mormons are disproportionately represented in the CIA.
bar too high Ebook
A recruiter told the Salt Lake Tribune that returned Mormon missionaries are valued for their foreign language skills, abstinence from drugs and alcohol, and respect for authority. The doctrine of "continuous revelation" is a central tenant of Mormonism. Mormons believe that Jesus, under the direction of God or Heavenly Father , leads the church by revealing his will to the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, who is considered a modern-day prophet and seer.
Mormons regard the sayings of the modern prophets as additional scripture, and are open to the possibility that God could reveal more scripture in the future. So unlike most Christian denominations, Mormonism has an open religious canon - the church's doctrine always has the potential to change. Perhaps the most famous modern-day prophecy is the revelation that all males - including black men - could hold the Mormon priesthood.
The Twilight series, by Mormon author Stephanie Meyers, is an allegory for the Mormon concept of "celestial marriage" - the belief that a couple that is "sealed" in a Mormon temple will stay bound together forever in the afterlife. Edward and Bella's bond is sealed when Edward bites Bella.
- Can't Miss.
- Situational Mentoring!
- What Does It Really Mean to Avoid Light-Mindedness and Loud Laughter?!
As with a Mormon marriage, there's no turning back for Bella, who is transformed into a vampire for eternity. Clearly, the idea has some appeal. The series has sold over million copies worldwide and is available in 38 languages. Although the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints the official Mormon church abolished the practice in , it still believes that the divine principle of plural marriage may apply in heaven.
The Plan of Salvation teaches that Heaven is divided into three separate kingdoms of glory: the celestial, the terrestrial, and the telestial. These kingdoms are where all men and women except a certain few known as Sons of Perdition, who will go to Outer Darkness will go after they are judged by God and their spirits are reunited with what will be their immortal bodies. Those judged to have followed the Gospel move on to the celestial kingdom, ruled by God himself. Those who did not devoutly follow but also did not actively reject the word of God are sent to the Terrestrial Kingdom, and those who actively rejected the Gospel or committed grievous sins must dwell in the Telestial Kingdom, away from God's light.
Latter-day Saints believe entrance into each kingdom depends on a person's worthiness and their adherence to the commandments of God and the ordinances he has prescribed. Since God is the ultimate judge, all people will be judged fairly and put into the kingdom where they will be most happy. Even so, according to Mormon theology, all three kingdoms are kingdoms of glory, and even the lowest is more glorious than man can currently comprehend. While it is true that the church has recently placed more emphasis on their Christian-ness than it once did, from the time the church was organized in onward, church members have always regarded themselves as Christians.
Their name, "Latter-day Saints" references the fact that members of the "primitive" church in New Testament times were called Saints. Gordon B. Hinckley , president of the church, has said, "We are Christians in a very real sense and that is coming to be more and more widely recognized. Once upon a time people everywhere said we are not Christians. They have come to recognize that we are, and that we have a very vital and dynamic religion based on the teachings of Jesus Christ.
There are Christians -- particularly among the modern evangelical and fundamentalist communities -- who argue that Mormons are not Christians. They base this contention on the fact that the Mormon conception of God -- summarized by LDS President Lorenzo Snow, who said, "As man is God once was, and as God is man may become" -- differs from traditional Christian ideas.
They also point to the Mormons' avoidance of the cross as a religious symbol Mormons believe it is a symbol of Christ's death, and they prefer to focus on his life, his suffering in the Garden of Gethsemane, and his resurrection ; their belief in the fallibility of the Bible because of its human translation ; their acceptance of continuing revelation which gives Mormonism an open canon ; and their rejection of the Nicene Creed, a list of common Christian beliefs originally authored in AD and subscribed to by most denominations.
Animosity between fundamentalist Christians and Mormons peaked in the s, when the Southern Baptist Convention held an annual meeting in Salt Lake City, partly in hopes of converting Mormons to Protestant Christianity. More recently, some high-profile fundamentalist Christians have gone on record apologizing for past discord and accepting Mormonism as a branch of Christianity, but some tension remains.
The Mormon temple is considered an earthly point of contact with higher spheres of being. Mormons believe that God is present in the temple space. This makes it a sacred place set aside to learn things that allow individuals to progress toward becoming like God -- the temple ordinances, especially celestial marriage, make "eternal progression toward Godhood" possible. The family unit is central to Mormonism, and the primary ritual function of the temple is to perform ceremonies that seal families together, thus allowing them to dwell together for eternity when they pass on to the celestial kingdom.
The specific rituals supporting this function are marriage and family sealing ceremonies -- in which a husband, wife and children are officially bound together -- and baptism for the dead -- through which individuals who died without accepting the Latter-day Saints' Gospel and no longer possess the physical body required for baptism are represented by living proxies, thereby granting them the opportunity to join their families in the celestial kingdom.
The temple is also used to perform the Mormon endowment ceremony. During this ritual, adult Mormons go through a series of lessons and exercises to deepen their faith, and they make covenants with God to keep his commandments. After receiving their endowments, Latter-day Saints wear a distinctive underwear on which special marks are embroidered. Known as "garments" , this underwear, worn next to the skin at nearly all times , is meant to remind individuals of their commitment to their faith and to God.
Men generally receive their endowment before going on a mission and women before they marry, but it is not a one-time ceremony like baptism. Saints are encouraged to return to the temple throughout their lives to continue growing their faith by experiencing the rituals of endowment. Before Latter-day Saints can go to the temple to receive their Endowments, they must obtain a Temple recommend, a card signed by a church leader to certify that the bearer is in good standing within the church. Good standing, ascertained by an interview process, includes having a strong testimony of the truth of the Gospel, keeping up with the law of tithing, following the 10 commandments and the Word of Wisdom, and otherwise proving one's faith and commitment.
Inside the temple, men wear all-white suits and women wear floor-length white dresses. Non-Mormons and Mormons without a temple recommend are not allowed into the temple. The church says this is to preserve the sacred nature of the practices that take place inside and to avoid potential distractions and disruptions. Non-Mormons are, however, welcome to attend the Latter-day Saints' chapels, where weekly Sunday services and meetings take place.
The general public are also allowed to tour newly-constructed temples during the brief window of time before they are officially dedicated. The most common and visible target for charges of suspicious secrecy in the Mormon religion are the temples. After dedication, these buildings are closed to the public and church members do not talk openly about the rituals that take place within.
The church holds that the temple and its rituals are sacred and therefore private, not secret. They maintain that early Christianity featured similar special practices and bodies of knowledge that were kept quiet to preserve their sacred nature. Church finances are also kept confidential, provoking criticism that there is no way for church members or outsiders to know where money from tithing and other revenue goes.
And the church has also been questioned about the secrecy surrounding their defense of doctrine. Latter-day Saints can face excommunication if, after being warned, they continue to publicly discuss problematic or provocative elements of Mormon theology that the church chooses not to draw attention to. Instead a memo went out. Reblogged this on Woosh. This article has proven once again that there are simply some things about organized religion that I will never understand.
Bat crap crazy by bat crap crazy for the bat rap crazy from the land of the utterly bat crap crazy! Humanity is grossly over rated. However once Jesus Christ came to the earth that doctrine was done away with. Such as how the Law of Moses was done away with once Jesus came. Furthermore when the LDS church did not allow men who were colored to obtain the priesthood it was due to the fact that the Lord had not told the Prophet of our church to allow it at that time.
Although it may seem like segregating unlike other churches we did not have separate meeting houses for each color. It was taught in doctrine until very recently. Can a perfect god change his mind on something so profoundly immoral? And why would he happen to do so just at the time that the broader culture was shifting to recognize the immorality of racism? And why would he follow the pack rather than leading? Please for your spiritual soul, get away from any thing that takes you away from Torah.
Please get help. Ever heard of ISIS? Or Charles Manson? How about the religious people in Tokyo Japan, a dooms day religion just like many Christian cults, including Mormonism that attacked people in a subway with nerve gas? If such an easily checkable detail as that is missed what else are the authors missing or mistaken about?
What are the Key Differences Between Mormonism and Christianity? « Biola Magazine
I myself worry constantly about what else I may have missed. Thank you! The remaining is attributed to genetics i. Again this varies from individual to individual. Therefore I have issues with the broad brush stroke painting of the act as simply a manifestation of Korean Culture. I think your conclusion is way too simplistic stereotyping and potentially betrays your cultural input bias. On an anthropological level. To enforce it they believed that malicious spirits abounded there at that time.
The reality was this part and time coincided with the breeding season. In one clan the tribes made major decisions by the whole tribe even women yet their role was by some feminist models sexist in that men had duties and women had duties… every person knew and accepted their place in the tribe and drew their identity place in the universe from both hierarchy in our sense was a mystery to them. Primitive culture? We could learn some from them. Was their life utopian …no it was short and brutal by our standards. Such stereotyping is the plinth on which prejudices are cobbled together. PS I am not a professional and claim no special expertise.
Pingback: On the Cross Much? Pingback: Waarom kindmisbruikende RK-priesters geestelijk normaal zijn Mallemoeders blog…. Pingback: Washington Liberals - Why can they get away with ridiculing Mormons? If you have a problem with being a mormon and the things the mormon church demands from you then you should reconsider your affiliation with them. I have heard the dark skin thing taught. Brigham Young, 2nd President of the Church. This will always be so. You see some classes of the human family that are black, uncouth, un- comely, disagreeable and low in their habits, wild, and seemingly deprived of nearly all the blessings of the intelligence that is generally bestowed upon mankind.
The first man that committed the odious crime of killing one of his brethren will be cursed the longest of any one of the children of Adam. Cain slew his brother. Cain might have been killed, and that would have put a termination to that line of human beings. This was not to be, and the Lord put a mark upon him, which is the flat nose and black skin. How long is that race to endure the dreadful curse that is upon them? That curse will remain upon them, [p. They were the first that were cursed, and they will be the last from whom the curse will be removed.
When the residue of the family of Adam come up and receive their blessings, then the curse will be removed from the seed of Cain, and they will receive blessings in like proportion. It is not the prerogative of the President of the United States to meddle with this matter, and Congress is not allowed, according to the [p. If Utah was admitted into the Union as a sovereign State, and we chose to introduce slavery here, it is not their business to meddle with it; and even if we treated our slaves in an oppressive manner, it is still none of their business and they ought not to meddle with it.
John Taylor, 3rd President of the Church. And why did it pass through the flood?
- Oculto en el corazón: Enamorados II (Spanish Edition);
- Coyame es mi pueblo (Spanish Edition).
- mormonism a bar too high and eighty eight keys Manual?
- Plural Marriage.
- Frequently Asked Questions.
- The Mormon Dilemma: What About Mormon Latinos? | Phoenix New Times.
The belief that blacks were less valiant in the pre-existence may have been started by Orson Hyde, an original member of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles. This is the earliest statement we are aware of that discusses this: At the time the devil was cast out of heaven, there were. They consequently did not take a very active part on either side, but rather thought the devil had been abused, and considered he had rather the best claim to the government. The joy of the first was to expose—that of the second was to cover the unseemliness of their father. The conduct of the former brought the curse of slavery upon him, while that of the latter secured blessings, jurisdiction, power and dominion.
Here was the beginning of blessing and cursing in the family of Noah, and here also is the cause of both. Canaan, the son of Ham, received the curse ; for Noah wished to place the curse as remote from himself as possible. He therefore placed it upon his grandson instead of his son. Now, it would seem cruel to force pure celestial spirits into the world through the lineage of Canaan that had been cursed. This would be ill appropriate, putting the precious and vile together.
But those spirits in heaven that rather lent an influence to the devil, thinking he had a little the best right to govern, but did not take a very active part any way were required to come into the world and take bodies in the accursed lineage of Canaan ; and hence the negro or African race. Now, therefore, all those who are halting concerning who has the right to govern had better look at the fate of their brethren that have gone before them, and take warning in time lest they learn obedience by the things which they suffer.
A curse placed upon him and that curse has been continued through his lineage and must do so while time endures. Millions of souls have come into this world cursed with a black skin and have been denied the privilege of Priesthood and the fullness of the blessings of the Gospel. These are the descendants of Cain. Moreover, they have been made to feel their inferiority and have been separated from the rest of mankind from the beginning….
The reason is that we once had an estate before we came here, and were obedient, more or less, to the laws that were given us there. Those who were faithful in all things there received greater blessings here, and those who were not faithful received less. Young in a meeting held December 25 , , in Salt Lake City, said that Joseph Smith had declared that the Negroes were not neutral in heaven, for all the spirits took sides, but the posterity of Cain are black because he Cain committed murder.
It cannot be looked upon as just that they should be deprived of the power of the Priesthood without it being a punishment for some act, or acts, performed before they were born. Spencer W. Kimball, 12th President of the Church. For years they have been growing delightsome… The children in the home placement program in Utah are often lighter than their brothers and sisters in the hogans on the reservation…There was the doctor in a Utah city who for two years had had an Indian boy in his home who stated that he was some shades lighter than the younger brother just coming into the program from the reservation.
These young members of the Church are changing to whiteness and to delightsomeness. Kimball; The Improvement Era, Dec. To go against this commandment of God would be in sin. Those who willfully sin with their eyes open to this wrong will not be surprised to find that they will be separated from the presence of God in the world to come. This is spiritual death. It does not matter if they are one-sixth Negro or one-hundred and sixth, the curse of no Priesthood is the same.
If an individual who is entitled to the Priesthood marries a Negro, the Lord has decreed that only spirits who are not eligible for the Priesthood will come to that marriage as children. It has blinded the thinking of some of our own people, I believe. They have allowed their political affiliations to color their thinking to some extent, and then, of course, they have been persuaded by some of the arguments that have been put forth. We who teach in the Church certainly must have our feet on the ground and not to be led astray by the philosophies of men on this subject.
He is not just seeking the opportunity of sitting down in a cafe where white people eat. From this, and other interviews I have read, it appears that the Negro seeks absorption with the white race. He will not be satisfied until he achieves it by intermarriage. That is his objective and we must face it. We must not allow our feelings to carry us away, nor must we feel so sorry for Negroes that we will open our arms and embrace them with everything we have. Was segregation a wrong principle? When the Lord chose the nations to which the spirits were to come, determining that some would be Japanese and some would be Chinese and some Negroes and some Americans, He engaged in an act of segregation.
When He cursed the descendants of Cain as to the Priesthood, He engaged in segregation. Was it some man, or was it God? And when He placed them there, He segregated them. At least in the cases of the Lamanites and the Negro we have the definite word of the Lord Himself that he placed a dark skin upon them as a curse — as a punishment and as a sign to all others. He forbade intermarriage with them under threat of extension of the curse. And He certainly segregated the descendants of Cain when He cursed the Negro as to the Priesthood, and drew an absolute line.
You may even say He dropped an Iron curtain there. We are willing that the Negro have the highest education. I would be willing to let every Negro drive a Cadillac if they could afford it. I would be willing that they have all the advantages they can get out of life in the world. But let them enjoy these things among themselves. I think the Lord segregated the Negro and who is man to change that segregation? This Negro, who, in the pre-existence lived the type of life which justified the Lord in sending him to the earth in their lineage of Cain with a black skin, and possibly being born in darkest Africa—if that Negro is willing when he hears the gospel to accept it, he may have many of the blessings of the gospel.
In spite of all he did in the pre-existent life, the Lord is willing, if the Negro accepts the gospel with real, sincere faith, and is really converted, to give him the blessings of baptism and the gift of the Holy Ghost. If that Negro is faithful all his days, he can and will enter the celestial kingdom. He will go there as a servant, but he will get celestial glory. Richards spoken in conference. He has been given a black skin…. But that is as nothing compared with that greater handicap that he is not permitted to receive the Priesthood and the ordinances of the temple, necessary to prepare men and women to enter into and enjoy a fulness of glory in the celestial kingdom….
What is the reason for this condition, we ask, and I find it to my satisfaction to think that as spirit children of our Eternal Father they were not valiant in the fight. Neither could they have been a part of those who rebelled and were cast down, for the latter had not the privilege of tabernacling in the flesh. Somewhere along the line were these spirits, indifferent perhaps, and possibly neutral in the war.
We have no definite knowledge concerning this. But I learn this lesson from it, brethren and sisters, and I believe we all should, that it does not pay in religious matters, matters that pertain to our eternal salvation, to be indifferent, neutral, or lukewarm. Heaven knows how to put a proper price upon its goods;…. I marvel at the presumptive arrogance it must take for someone to knock on doors and tell another intelligent I hope person that their creed or beliefs is better than the ones they hold.
As someone who determined early in life that all super natural belief was impossible to know and wishful thinking, I find all religions disappointing to say the least. It seems like so much silliness. Angels, gold tablets you lose, magic underwear, you must admit it is far-fetched. Add to that the fact that Smith was convicted of fraud and LDS looks like an epidemic of contagious insanity. Where is the garden of Eden?
Adam-ondi-adman is in Missouri Were he gathered his children and such. I remember watching a news story on television, the facts of which I was personally familiar with, since it occurred in my neighborhood. I was amazed at how such a simple, straightforward story could be so twisted. I assume it was misrepresented for the purpose of increasing the interest of the viewers. The same thing has happened here. This article was obviously written to shock, rather than reveal truth. Do Mormons have some weird beliefs? Do other Christians have some weird beliefs? No education necessary, just simple unquestioning faith.
All the rest is just religious artifice used by immoral men mostly to control others. I have a very deep understanding of Christianity, as a former believer, and a very shallow understanding of Hinduism, yet both seem utterly crazy to me. One has to become like a child in almost any Xian religious belief. Becoming a child does not mean having simple unquestioning faith.
Becoming a child involves increasingly becoming more like the savior. It means having a faith that is tempered with experience and that continually looks forward and upward. Being child like to me means being optimistic about the future and hopeful. It also involves recognizing my relationship with God which is a father-son relationship.
Children have very little or no experience, so they must rely on the adults around them to teach them the reality of life, how to think critically, and how to separate fact from fiction. The dogma attributed to some guy named Jesus that one must become as a child to enter heaven, can only be understood as a requirement not to question or doubt the dogma, just accept it the same way a child accepts that Santa is real.
The Book of Mormon just makes up things or copies things, just like the Bible. There is a similar scripture in the Bible to the one you quote, which says that the carnal mind is at enmity with God KJV. Knowledge, learning, questioning, doubting are all bad things according to the Bible. How many children raised in the Mormon faith are allowed to really doubt and question everything they are taught by their parents, teachers and elders?
I suspect that most, as in many other denominations, dare not question the dogma, which is how all religions perpetuate themselves. Actually we very greatly believe in education. And yes we are told to become as a child, because children are meek, submissive, and lowly in heart. Although our minds and our bodies are constantly growing until we can become like unto a child who is a lover of all people then the Lord may judge us differently.
By different I mean that we may not enter the highest degree of the Kingdom Of God because we did not become as a child. You will then know for yourselves and not for another. And if you truly do have and understanding of Christianity then you will know that the LDS religion believes in Jesus Christ as the Son of God and that is what our church is based on. As a Mormon, I cannot speak for early leaders whose comments were wrong. But as an honest person I will recognize something completely proven. I am disappointed that while the church does so many good things that are never mentioned that we seem to be dishonest about the past.
Scared too death of it actually. I do not believe our Lord ever covered up anything, even when it costs him followers. That , quite frankly is what troubles me so much. Jesus never had to be forced to tell the truth. Even if and it did killed Him. To the learned, highly educated leaders of our church this member of no standing counsels Just tell the truth, the WHOLE truth and nothing but the truth. There is no such thing as lying for The Lord. This I do know in the name of Jesus Christ. They all were teaching that Adam is God doctrine back then not just Brigham Young.
Everything said in this article can be said of all of the Christian religions and non Christian religions. This article was written by an Evangelical. That should be a red flag right there. The universe scares them because they do not undrstand it. Not everything has answers. There are many shades of grey in the world. That is like saying the Pope controlled the White House when Pres. Kennedy was in office. As a former Mormon you sound like you have a huge axe to grind. Every time a new U. President, several times during that U.
So I guess Pres. Obama calls up all these religious leaders every morning to have prayer and then decides who to follow for the day! Actually, the body of this article was written by a retired professor of religion who is Presbyterian ordained and who taught primarily at a Jesuit college. You are right on with your conclusion.
I am an ex-Mormon that was brainwashed. I am a Christian now and very happy! I am a professor of 33 years and a devout Mormon. I am astonished at the lack of truth on this web site… the lack of current scientific knowledge is most concerning, the apparent lack of willingness on the part of the webmaster to include information that refutes the sincere or pathological claims of some contributors is propagandistic. To address a few points: The Early Americas were, at the time of Joseph Smith, thought to have been verdant, unpopulated areas with no understanding among historians and anthropologists as to the number and variety of populations that had arrived in South America.
It was beyond the understanding of the science of the time. Now that has changed. He said there were many people long before science believed this to be the case. Now it is understood. Argue what you want… he saw it long before the science of the day and it has come to pass. I call him out as a liar!!! In truth, I am the same in reverse. That is way I recognize his methods. I am for the for Mormons, he is against.
Are we both mentally ill? But he is not willing to admit the possibility and thus the objectivity of science is gone. This web site should not host the ravings of the mentally ill. That does not advance the discussion. That contributor needs help. Go get it. That is the kind of prejudice and bigotry that has driven the uneducated masses of Islam to radical terrorism. Take a Prozac. The so called Mormon apologizing for the past…. If you were LDS you should get a spine.
If now, which is the case in researching the cookies, you are a liar and a hypocrite. And for all the contributors criticizing the Book of Mormon, the psychological basis of your criticism is transparent. Normally a therapist would try to make the patient feel better before suggesting change but in this case, the basis for the comments is justification of beliefs that are unstable within your own minds and rip on others to sure up your own shaky and unstable beliefs.
For a professor and neuropsychologist you sure have poor grammar and communication skills, as well as poor critical thinking and reasoning skills. You have not made even one convincing argument with that religious rant. Emily, I merely responded in kind. It is filled with rudeness towards other commenters here, calling them liars, unstable, mentally ill. Well, I only see they are only a F away from each other.
Nevertheless it will probably be futile because of the hardness of the prejudice out there. So, instead, I love each and every one of you.
11 Surprising Things You Didn't Know About Mormons
That pretty much sums up fundamentalists, whose beliefs are particularly dangerous to women and children. Bulwer, The LDS church does not in any way lead to members having homicidal tendencies towards others of other beliefs. As scriptures teach biblical and LDS we are to love one another regardless of their actions and beliefs. All this hate towards the church is hurtful and quite mean merely for the reason of trying to attack a specific group of people.
The members of the LDS church strive to be just like Christ as do members of other churches as well. When the gospel principles are studied one would come to realize that the church teaches very good principles that everyone can benefit from. Of course we will never be perfect as Christ was when He was here but thats what we strive for each and every day to be the best that we can be. Also, Christianity is not being persecuted even a microscopic bit in Europe or the Americas.
The issue that drove me out of Mormonism was the Book of Abraham. The papyri that Smith used to produce the book were found in in a Museum in New York. They were translated by Egyptologists and found to have nothing to do with Abraham and were Egyption funerary documents. But I am actually grateful when people point out typos and other errors. I am angry with the scientific comunity for propagating that Native Americans are the Decendants of Mongols. This is a known anthropological fact. The mongolid people were in central to west Europe at that time.
Next, the techonology in the Americas suggests that The people more likely migrated over from the far east of Europe. See arrow heads, and battle axes all this technology predates to east europe, and was never used by the mongoloid people. Next, during the age of Kahn, there was a heavy slave influx of Jewish people into the Mongol population. This was known when the genetic studies were made, and a lot of data was tossed.
In my opinion, the conclusions are completely invalid. And, even today, you can find a large amount of Jewish markers in Mongol decendants. Hence, if you are trying to say that this is proof against the Mormonism, you are blowing smoke up someones ass trying to prove a point. The truth is, that there were multipule migrations to the americas. There is proof positive that early in the Xin dynasty Xin now common chineese had several boats that may have left large settlements in the americas. Remains have been found to confirm this. There is proof positive that there were decendants that crossed the atlantic bridge.
This is easily seen in the common technologies. The people that inhabited the north russian area at the time of the pacific bridge were most likely pre-siberinic white, and not likely did not contribute much. But, the Eskimo people do have a strong coorilation to Mongolid people… Including the Jewish genitic markers.
And, valid research shows that they did not migrate into the northlands until much later. Native Americans in the east have been shown to have later European markers as well this data also was tossed from the all Native Americans are Mongols postulate , and this is evident as it is known that Vikings many have had several settlements in North America. My big problem is that people are trying to come up with a simple migration plan for mankind. But, the truth is, man did not migrate in simple paths.
Available scientific evidence indicates that modern humans emerged from Africa over , years ago, yet did not arrive in the Americas until less than 20, years ago. I was born to Mormon parents in Payson Utah, I know this to be true. Resurrected Jesus hanging out with the lost tribes in America? What a crazy crock of crap!
Not that any other religion is much better. Ahh, Jake, science has shown that the native Americans are descended from Asians, who in turn are descended from Africans, as are Europeans, Arabs, etc. The only European blood in them is post-contact and they all came from the far east of Russia, China, Mongolia, etc.
And Mongols were never in Eastern Europe; they were in Eastern Asia, which is where all the migrations came from. Disgustingly inaccurate. For those of you who actually want to know what the Mormons believe, stop a smissionary on street or invite them in for 30 minutes when they knock on your door. Or ask a friend or neighbor. Hi Chris — I hear you and some others saying that this article is inaccurate.
You will always find someone to support your claim, either way. I am a returned missionary too. Worth more th an my M. You do not have any room to speak on the legitimacy of a religion being a catholic. You people are way more twisted than the Mormons. Absolutely disgusting. Not to mention the molestations that happen, on what seems like a daily basis, by your priests or whatever you call them.
Religion is the biggest hoax mankind has ever come up with. Were you trying to reply to another commenter? Thed LDS discourages members from reading historical data from early Church leaders because it does show that they were often at odds with what is taught today. Take the Adam is God doctrine believed by most of the early prophets, apostles and presidents.
Brigham Young stated he got this teaching from Joseph Smith. Apostle Heber C. Cannon ,Eliza R. Snow — , plural wife of Joseph Smith, Jr. It clearly states that Adam was the god that they were worshipping. It was also taught that Adam came to earth , had physical sex with Mary and begat Jesus. These are historical LDS documents. Why do so many people worry about other religions, when they should be spending time building their own faith?
How about spending time telling me about your belief and why I should believe like you do instead of telling me how wrong other people are! The Bible you profess to believe in never explains that you should try to tear other people down, but to preach His Word. You have a funny way of doing this. I was raised Pentecostal…. I met then my girlfriend….
Also, at least everyone was together, unlike every other church who had one congregation for Caucasians and a different one for every other race. That is much more racist. I am roman-catholic priest and teologist at the local university. I will not speak about their book but since I know many of them and have been investigated their doctrines for many years, things stated above are not correct or just written to sound very subjective and negative. My church has done so much evil through centuries but I am not responsible for that.
People are not perfect but throwing stones on someone like this is just pathetic. Some Mormons and former Mormons have said otherwise, and the article was drafted by someone who was also a religion professor at a Jesuit university for years. Which parts do you disagree with? I have only lived in Utah for 6 months, but in that short time I have come to realize that Mormons are some of the most psychotic, twisted people on earth. To be fair, I think all organized religion is B. Absolute, undeniable psychos.
And the fact we almost had a Mormon president is scary considering what these freaks believe. Every single aspect of life in Utah is controlled and run by these nut jobs, the last thing we need is the entire country controlled by one. Relax people. Number one to survive in this life is to respect one another and to accept that everyone is unique.
We are here to be good to one another and make the world a better place. Can we all just get along?
I was raised Mormon. I stopped attending church in my early teens. Peer pressure, reading and listening to different opinions from people. The Bible? There are many interpretations, as with all books. Religious or not. Just want to say if you really believe this bull crap look at lds. Most other sites about mormons are actually led by anti-mormons who use false resources and also use ex-mormons who have no idea about what is going on in the church as sources as well. Finally 2 is wrong. If there was at least half a million people living and trading from coast to coast it would be somewhere from Panama to the beginning of Mexico.
This is also a considerable fact since there was no mention of any winter back then. Also stone buildings have been found in Guatamala in the jungles there and many more remain to be uncovered. Bishop Darrel L. I have been asked to forward to you for acknowledgment and handling the enclosed copy of a letter to President Gordon B.
Hinckley from Ronnie Sparks of your ward. Brother Sparks inquired about the location of the Hill Cumorah mentioned in the Book of Mormon, where the last battle between the Nephites and Lamanites took place. The Church has long maintained, as attested to by references in the writings of General Authorities, that the Hill Cumorah in western New York state is the same as referenced in the Book of Mormon. The Brethren appreciate your assistance in responding to this inquiry, and asked that you convey to Brother Sparks their commendation for his gospel study.
Freedom of…. Cancer would be nice. Disease, maybe one day. Freedom of….. Get it! I was wondering if an extensive citation list is available? There are in-text citations, throughout the article; However, some things are left un-cited. I would like to do some deeper research on points touched on in this article, and a complete citation list would be much appreciated. Pingback: Religion - What Say You?
I do not understand the arguments here. Not at all. I am not a huge person of faith and tend to be more scientific requiring proof before I place my faith in something. All religions have historical discrepancies chiefly due to them being formed hundreds or even thousands of years ago, some even before mankind could write passed along via oral tradition.
Related Mormonism: A Bar Too High and Eighty-eight Keys
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved