Great possibility of inspiration in those ancient texts that were used by the second century and maybe even the FIRST-century church. YOUR point is irrational and mute. Until then we KNOW that their teachings ofter vary from what you accept in your man-made politically-inspired Bible.
And WHY 15 centuries later we are more likely to have an inspired Bible that in the second century? One day you and I are going to stand before our Lord Jesus Christ and give an account of our lives. When I stand before my Lord I will say something like this; Lord you told me that your words were pure words, as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. You told me that you would keep those words and that you would preserve those words. You also told me that Heaven and earth would pass away, but your words not word , but your words would not pass away. You also told me that from a child Timothy had known the holy scriptures, and I know Lord, that they were not the originals.
So Lord I believed you and told people that they had the Holy words of God and thus the Holy scriptures. Happylada, you will stand before your Lord and say something like this. Lord I know that there were errors in all of the manuscripts and that we did not have a perfect copy of the scriptures. But Lord you know how hard I worked to determine as best I could what was the right readings.
I would rather believe God preserved his words perfectly. But that takes faith, and faith comes from the heart, not the head. Ye shall KNOW them by their fruits. Exactly, BUT the KJ is NOT the words that will not pass away — they are the corrupted words of man, revised to suit an earthly King, full of contradictions and confusion as I have already demonstrated. That is a man-made pharasaical tradition of man; mostly man that refused to acknowledge the value of Studying the Bible and its history as the Bereans did.
They are as untainted as silver purified in a furnace on the ground, where it is thoroughly refined. Do you presume the NWT is inspired? I do NOT make tht error. NO, that takes arrogance and a bit of ignorance. That is foolishness. At least I will be HONEST with God and be able to state that I did the best I could to honestly understand the words He gave to his original sources, who then copied it for others — and some of that we have.
God makes NO errors, neither is the author of confusion. NO it takes arrogance and ignorance.
Join Kobo & start eReading today
Your statements are based on your opinion and doctrine, which ignores scholarship, study and history AND the Bible. FROM the Bible. You are speculating. Your final authority is your own noodle! Thus your conclusion is merely the words of a wicked sinful corrupt liar, just like me. You have no authority for you do not have the words of God. Ever learning and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.
BOTH are corrupted vairants. Exactly as I stated. Still do. Maybe MORE because of its declining usage. But it IS a pity that people have these man-made ideas and push them off as Christian teaching, and themselves as knowledgable students of the Bible. Think about the worship you give to a corrupt translation rather than dilligently studying the words of God as copied down by Godly men following the apostles. There are enough stumbling blocks today to faith in the Resurrected Jesus that we OUGHT not be tossing out any more — like corrupted texts, archaic English, and unhistorical meanings.
And you do many things like that. They would look into these things more than the average christian I have read similar conclusions elsewhere. Not an exhaustive article i realise, but as a bible publisher, they have taken on the responsibility to be faithful in the translation and publication of the bible, in many languages.
I have a question: were christians divided about the word of God as much as after Westcott and Hort? If not, then it seems the critical texts have introduced an unwarranted, unwanted extra thing for Christians to debate and fall out over. Yes, its human fallen nature to do so, yet it is still going on after along while. I do think model versions are corrupt, and ALL translations have errors: some are well known, some are not widely publicised.
I do think it has some application though to knowing the differences between the english versions we have today. Some are inspired, some are clearly the musings of man Message et al , and many shades in-between. Let us be one in hope, and love and faith, yet discerning as to where we get doctrine from. Like the article posted here says, we have a responsibility to be proclaiming an undiluted gospel with backing from a version that upholds all the key doctrines, otherwise we pass on our errors to the next generation. Im not here to divide but discriminate, like the word is meant to.
Not everything old is less and not everything new is more. Just saying. The main reasons I read KJV are: 1. It is old fashioned, but its fine as it is. God Bless you all and thanks for the article! My father was a serious Bible stuident — 8 years of language and theology — and a staunch KJ supporter. I knew the KJ has full of errors even as a teenager, and its language was delinerately archaic.
I work with street people and addicts. The KJ is impossible a version to use with them, as it was with me having grown up with it, but for different reasons. Many great men died to bring the Bible into the language of the common man — the KJ dishonor their memory and sacrifice. This examines the contradictions between the KJ and Strongs. Hi happylada. Im being accused of venerating KJV. I think it is a worthy translation of my reading and study. I prefer it and see it has errors as I originally alluded to with the word ALL.
I am not KJV only. These poor arguements are straw men. I have multiple versions available, but rarely read them. One cannot fault him for a few errors. How sad you attack. I did not, merely proposed my views. The christian love was missing but the hurt was not. Sorry for rubbing the sore spot.
It was my desire to see people work it out for themselves: the best manuscripts I. Modern translation, in general, use corrupt texts or let the adjudication go to those whonsupport textual critisism. KJV did a good but imperfect job with a great majority text. Other modern versions using corrupt text may have done good job yet put doubt on the word of God by suggesting they were not there originally or remove verses entirely or other changes to text.
That impoverishes what the bible says. Sorry, you may prefer certain modern versions for their readability, but they do cast doubt, in the main.
- Dictionnaire amoureux de Naples (French Edition);
- Bible Study Tips.
- The Sweetest Temptation (Mills & Boon Kimani Arabesque) (Whitfield Brides, Book 2);
- Gendered Politics in the Modern South: The Susan Smith Case and the Rise of a New Sexism (Making the Modern South).
- MOS - Alliance of Confessing Evangelicals?
I wish all men to read a version they want to read more of, but remain wise about the issues. I admit I used to get angry and divisive about this version debate, now im wiser and grace is applied, I find the anger is from those who support other versions and denounce the KJV. How the tide turns… I admit KJV does muddy waters on some doctrinal issues, but it was not through deliberate leaving out of verses or poor study and deliberation.
KJV has errors, but are well known if not well known by all. Other versions will have as many errors, but are less well studied and less publicized. Love and peace to you, Happylada. Was I or your Master not worth spell checking for? I think I have misinterpreted your meaning in what you said at certain points, you likely were not attacking I think now, my fault. I apologise for poor reading of it.. I wish you all the best with the work the Lord has prepared for you.
I finally re-found the article that i was reminded of I read a while back… and a thoughtful article one of many! Isaiah 40v8. For newest information you have to visit internet and on world-wide-web I found this web page as a most excellent web page for most up-to-date updates. If some one wants to be updated with latest technologies therefore he must be go to see this site and be up to date every day.
I leave a response each time I like a article on a website or I have something to valuable to contribute to the discussion. Is it just me or do some of the remarks look like left by brain dead people? Could you make a list every one of all your shared sites like your twitter feed, Facebook page or linkedin profile?
It poses the question of the Sinaiticus and others on their validity. Fun watch. It was an egregiously biased documentary interviewing King James Only individuals and using dated and selective material aimed at a predetermined conclusion. There is one aspect of his documentary that is the most devastating to his conclusion and his credibility in doing fair research: he depends on year-old research!
He claims in the documentary that the leading scholars in the 19th century did not have the paleographical expertise and other similar areas of background to make claims about the authenticity of Codex Sinaiticus. This is not true. But for the sake of the argument let us say it is true. We have obviously made technological leaps in the past years in dating manuscripts, analyzing handwriting, and other means of dating a document to determine its spurious or authentic nature.
Pinto conveniently and selectively ignores what contemporary scholarship says. Or, if he is ignorant of contemporary research in this question, then why is he producing a documentary in the first place! Investigative documentaries—as Pinto is claiming he is doing—is about using the most update research and science. So either Pinto is intentionally ignoring the facts that he is aware of—which would make him deceptive; or he is incompetent as an investigative researcher—looking for selective evidence that will determine his intended conclusion.
Elliott, J. Thessaloniki: Patriarchal Institute for Patristic Studies, Parker, D. Jongkind, Dirk. Thomas J. Based on NO evidence available anywhere.
Just more silly and irrelevant imaginings based on poor scholarship, much like the many insertions, additions, deletions and emanations that formed the basis for the KJ Bible. There ARE no omitted Scriptures. Simply a myth created by cultists who make the false assumption that a corrupted version designed to support a state church is the REAL Bible, and that before it no one had the Word of God. Just like the KJ translators — and other rational and honest translators have done for centuries — where there are passages NOT found in ALL ancient texts, or there is a variation — the passage in question is placed in footnotes, etc.
WHY, is the question. Thank you Mike for taking the time to write this article. I can agree with you that I believe there is not necessarily a conspiracy to ruin the Bible. However you mentioned the over 65 thousand words that have been deleted from the NIV version, but you never commented on those. It is my belief that these words in most cases are deleted to soften the original text, in order not to offend the reader. The use of Baptize rather than immerse supported Infant baptism, Bishop rather than elder supported the church hierarchy and the inclusion of the Apocrypha supported Purgatory.
The KJ is one of the most corrupted and purpose driven Bibles Bibles translated for the express purpose of supporting heretical doctrines anywhere — perhaps on a par with the NWT, which I am sure YOU would agree is corrupt. And of course, there is that nagging question of the hundreds of errors in the KJ, the multiple versions, and the Apocrypha. KJO folk are truly anti-biblical. Thank you and God bless you! There are SO many variants, which one is perfect?
Reality and common sense are NOT applied. And can you tell me WHY the KJ should have included and merged and cross-referenced the Apocrypha with the sacred texts? Yes there is an agenda to make satan Jesus. Doesnt take a bible scholar to figure that out. Stop playing into Lucifers hands. Then again you wont know who Lucifer is if you havent got the authorised King James!!!!
If the first one was, why did God make so many mistakes?
The revisions included changes in punctuation, capitalization, spelling, many hundreds of changes in words, word order, possessives, singulars for plurals, articles, pronouns, conjunctions, prepositions, entire phrases, and the addition and deletion of words. More than errors in the first edition of the K. There came to be well over 75, word changes. How many words does it take to make a translation uninspired? How many mistakes does God make? According to the Word itself only the original writings are God-breathed. No translation that is touched of man is perfect as the original writings were but we can seek the truth and God will lead us to accuracy.
Elizabethan English is out of the question. What was wrong with the Bishops Bible? The Geneva Bible? IT is filled with insertions, personal opinion, and marginal notes included as text. Many hundreds of times in various revisions. He admitted it was NEVER in any Greek text — But because he was a catholic theologian and opposed to the reformation, he was criticized that it was missing. The ending of Revelation that is so precious to many, was made up from sermon notes from priests, NOT a single Greek text available to Erasmus nor the KJ translators had it.
A definition of a cult is believing what is NOT evidence and false — but refusing to investigate. GOD said come — let us Reason together.
- The Bar Book: Elements of Cocktail Technique!
- Apocalypse Cow: The Short Story of a Bloodthirsty Longhorn.
- Thank God Theyre on Our Side: The United States and Right-Wing Dictatorships, 1921-1965.
- Vampires Dont Sparkle!!
BUT you will reject it because it makes your paper pope less than perfect, which of course it is. IT contains hundreds of errors — some deliberate. Some irrational. Some at the request of the KING. BUT mostly because it was based on a very poor catholic text published to head off Luther and the Reformation. BE my guest. This is complete and utter garbage….. If it is older which is doubtful it were tampered with long ago. Then you have no authority to say or believe anything absolute.
Welcome to the church of Laodicea. God is not the author of confusion, your article only adds to it. On what basis would you make these insinuations? YOU have no possible foundation other than pure bigotry and ignorance of textual issues. HOW then could it be based upon it? Facts might be a better source. The first a family meal, the second cannibalism. Please attempt to restrict your statements to FACT-based information. Exactly — so here you are mocking those that dedicate their lives to studying exactly WHO and what was inserted and left out.
The ending of Revelations is pure conjecture on Erasmus part. YOU are being totally disingenuous. Another KJO cultists line if ever there was one. Those of us who try to keep abreast of the scholarship that gives us a I agree with you my friend the church was infiltrated by the first or second century if not before actually or I feel from my studies.
I started my studies to disprove the existence of a God or any, which He has proved me wrong. That the Catholic Bibles contain them shows their lack of discernment — that the KJ Bible contained them showed their subservience to the Catholic structures. YOU have simply been lied to. And ASSUMING the early church was infiltrated since the 2nd century when all its doctrines and practices were being established — WHO do you think is wise enough to contradict the very disciples of the disciples?
Peters church in Rome that was ordered by our father to be destroyed. YOUR superficial inditement of same is theologically vacuous. YOU twist reality to fit your presuppositions. MEdoubts its authentic. And this almost verges on a deliberate lie. SO If you plan on keeping the Sabbath, you must also be circumcised and have blood sacrifices. YOUR argument is utterly ridiculous. OH, and Constantine? ALL those utter fabrications you have been taught are utterly false. Matt So let meet this straight. There were no accurate bible translations until the 19th century? That sounds crazy..
The Word has said the word is God breathed: Away with all the excuses textural variants and such…Gods word must be able to give total security and never insecurity to believers of it…Most ppl dont trace or are knowledgeable as to how to search out if the bible is true. Challenge everything! My Friend. Every one should care enough to study the Word for themselves. When My daughter was Diagnosed I set out to prove he did not exist not only was I proved wrong by Yahweh.
He has since my coming to Him turned her 6 weeks into 6 years no end in sight Yahweh willing I love my Yahweh! But due to her sickness I quit the fire dept. I now have all day to study his word and biblical histories and Languages. My GOD is mighty. You would like to borrow my glasses? FUNNY though you are OK with the version you probably use, removing many complete books as compared to the version. WITH, of course, many insertions from his imagination, some from the Vulgate, priests notes, etc. NO apostle used those books — Jesus never used those books — they have NO reason to be part of Chrisdtiandom.
They contain great heresy. IT is the foundation for teaching Purgatory. Almost every person of God I have come by has stated to me that everyone should read the 14 books removed and make their own decision based on the reasons of their removal because some pan out some do not see to fit that criteria. I am not an expert was under discipleship until I started finding flaws in the book of our time and the many celebrations of man that are supported by the church as a whole that clearly are against the word of God that I see as a clear infiltration of the church. I advise everyone that wishes to walk with Yahweh to understand.
And where are these imaginary flaws you think you have found? WHO infiltrated it? Several errors in this — first that verse you misuse has NOTHING to do with an obelisk in front of any church — and second you conflate the Catholic church with biblical Christianity. Matt Open in Logos Bible Software if available. One of the ten Commandments and if you watch you-tube you can even see it your self. Sure search also to see the Egyptions used it to worship RA the sun God. Do not let people keep the blinder on your eyes any longer ever wonder why they call us pagans, HELLO?
The list of wrongs we have done Go on forever because. Next lady i am kinda ashamed you as a Christian are to be hateful especially to those that can be converted as you cannot convert the offended and you are showing NO love. Second start studying before posting it make you and Christ look bad. I know here comes the long winded return slam post….. I love History all of it. Now slam away at me as you wish the Lords seed is planted for Gods chosen Grafts.
And N O — you can not respond spiritually — for your knowledge of the Bible is terribly warped by the demonic presence you follow — and certainly unorthodox. And your point is? YOU are brimming with hypocrisy. TIL then you are simply spread lies. Col Therefore do not let anyone judge you with respect to food or drink, or in the matter of a feast, new moon, or Sabbath days And not ONE gentile Christian ever kept the Sabbath. JUST an anti-scriptural opinion. YOU have a great knack for telling lies. Unless you are lying.
This is somehow relevant how? You are like whitewashed tombs that look beautiful on the outside but inside are full of the bones of the dead and of everything unclean. NOT yet, but you are close. Liars have NO right to expect love — but straight talk. And NO correction seems good at the time. I cannot greet a person as a Christian who is not a Christian nor should I condone their false doctrine.
For this reason rebuke them sharply that they may be healthy in the faith and not pay attention to Jewish myths 16 and commands of people who reject the truth. But to those who are corrupt and unbelieving, nothing is pure, but both their minds and consciences are corrupted. SO you are either very confused or a deliberate liar.
In neither case is pussyfooting around with your deception a sign of love. LOVE is to call out your evil and expose it. Had you approached this as a discussion, my tone would be very different — BUT you imposed your false cult teaching as mandatory on the church from a position of spiritual superiority and pride. THAT needs to be rebuked — according to the Scripture above. GOD makes a habit of offending the intellect to reveal the spirit.
Spiritual arrogance and pride prevent folk from ever knowing GOD. I pray that someday you may come to know Jesus as your savior — and know the joy of sins forgiven and assurance of your path towards heaven. To take the time and possibly money to sit down and alter a Holy Book? Why not just keep making it available? Unless there is something in it, no business puts in that sort of time to alter so many scriptures which the work of the devil.
The Bible says that in the last days many will be decieved and possibly even the elect paraphrasing. This is why there are so many versions yet in various faitgs there is only one book. The one closest to the truth has a copyright on it and those wanting to use it for apps to help people learn cannot?? The old version they are trying to get rid of so if it was not the work of the devil they would let people use if they wanted to but why go all out to stop them to the point of making it a legal thing huh?
Have they altered the devils bible? Someone who would sell that could not have the true word of God at hwart and whoever sold them marerials that corrolates with it plus the Bible, the devil got to them through the lust for money and even the concordance they took over has been discontinues because it is the truth.
Most believers are clueless about this and do not even aware if all the tampering becauae they aee caught up in thorns the worries of life. At the end of days God will deal with all accordingly. The damage is done because people have hard copies and wont search and buy the old ones and apps are trying to take over making it appwar more conveniebd and changes are creeping in. The new version promotes a lie as the word has been changed. So called believers and pastors need to be prepared to put the work in to learn the Biblical languages or will stay decieved and will pay the consequences.
May the Church be revived and refreshed and may they want to open the eyes of their hearts enough to know the truth and learn the Biblical lanuages just as much as they were prepared to complete a degree meaning they must be capable of learning the Biblical languages then seeking a job money and must therefore be able to seek God enough to find this all out, know what to do and learn the scriptures in a more original form and those who search God will teach.
The Bible says to seek God with all your heart and that he will be found of we seek Him and He is the Word.. Simple as. Your comment makes no sense. IF you are going to pay 30 scholars to take two years to create a new translation — whence thinks you the money for that comes?
NOW I have an online subscription to Laridian — and to the best of my knowledge NO Bible there costs more than 10 bucks — many are free. Bible Societies have free Bibles in many versions — I think. BUT who cannot afford Now some of my ancient Bibles are a different story. IF you want to buy their paper Bible its a tad pricey — The KJ was, in FOR centuries.
And WHO are these imaginary folk who are changing the Bible? As far back as the translators of the KJB noted that theirs was a poor transation, in need of revision, and in the future would need additional refining as language changed. That additional insight into the actual Books used by the apostles and Christians in the NT church allow us a much better insight into their thoughts and practices. Oh, and Concordances? NOT a good business invstment for a publisher. The net id fREE and far more expansive. AS well they should.
There were two trees in the garden of Eden. The tree of life and the tree of good and evil. Adam and Eve ate from the tree of good and evil. Had they eaten from the tree of life, man would never have to die, leave this Earth in a casket. This shows a lack of trust in the Holy Spirit of God. Remember satan is the author of confusion!! Why would God bless us with His Holy Word in english then change it a few years later? Do some praying and research, those manuscripts used for the modern versions were corrupted.
Remember satan does have an agenda against God and His people. NOT scriptural or Christian faith, but the traditions and dead works of churcianity. That is an assumption of prophetic revelation, as it has NO foundation at all in texts. OR do the accounts of the apostles and early fathers NOT carry any weight? The deliberate lies that are told about there being only two streams of texts and many OTHER claims are not only false but absurd; it DOES, however, make the typical cults us vs them mentality viable. He opposes the new versions because it makes the Bible relevant and understandable.
AND he is an expert at making the Bible a mystery to as many as possible, first through the latin readings of Catholocism, and more recently through the rise of the KJO cult out of the SDA cult. Those who are voicing for other translation or versions may please point out what it is that makes KJV repulsive to them? What is it that they do not understand and would like to refer to these newer versions?
Even the KJ translators stated in the now-omitted notice to reader that it would need another update as language changed. They were NOT happy with their work; some of the translators refused to allow the finished product in their pulpits. ADD to that ist p;ol;itical interference and deliberate mistranslation of many words to support the Catholic anglican church of England and the divine right of the king, and you have textual corruption. Again language changes. Have you never read any differences between it and other Bibles?
You cannot even use Strongs on the KJ Bible without coming across perhaps contradictions, let alone the archaic language in some cases that has reversed the meaning of the texts from IT was not the best Ancient English translation. IT has been altered and revised as much as any other and is based on corrupted texts. WE have better mass and Texts. WE have hundreds not a handful of texts to compare. WE live in the 21st century NOT the 16th. Why would we assume that a few incomplete older manuscripts found discarded in the Vatican or in Alexandria would be more accurate than the Majority of manuscripts that have been passed down and used by churches?
Question is, do you recognize God when He is talking to you? Concerning biblical accuracy…our translations have botched so many things. Spiritual eyes see things differently than the natural eye. Trust that Holy Spirit can communicate what you need to know for your life. Faith trumps knowledge. Junia is translated to be a male. Romans That really must have upset the translators. DO you have any evidence for this? BUT then many things upset the translators. Jesus never spoke anything but simple common language, a pattern the apostles followed.
WHY would we not? And vice versa. AS well, the deliberate constraints placed upon the translators by James required them to maintain the catholic structures of the English church, as well as supprt the divine right of KINGS — the Geneva which was a better translation and more honest from the same texts and was ONLY a few years old but hated by royalty. It outsold the KJ for years. Some translators refused to allow the KJ in their pulpits. Copied pages that were rejected, maybe. The text presented to Tichendorf was carefully and reverently encased in a red velvet sheath.
As an expert historian and professor of Greek, White speaks at length about this utter fabrication and the reasons for its acceptance among the KJO cultists — it is NOT historic fact. Even the Eastern Orthodox. AND the deliberate insertions by Erasmus and others are also well documented.
This business of insertion sin to the Bible is nothing NEW — it is recorded in the first few centuries of the church. For years, when someone wanted to find a verse in the Bible, the fastest way to do it was with a Strong's Concordance. Since , when it was published by James Strong after being compiled by over workers who diligently listed every occurrence of every word in the KJV, it has been The Concordance , source: The Book of Mormon Miracle: 25 read for free read for free.
The Concordance Tameion of Erasmus Schmid has often been reprinted and reedited online. Free, like God intended the gospel to be! Time square church Sermons in tamil and links to tamil resources. Malayalam Christian Songs Awesome collection of morethan Malayalam songs online. While spreading this piece of deceitful misinformation, the KJV critics hold their breath, hoping that no one will be intelligent enough to ask for specific details about these "revisions".
This method of Bible study is for the "seeker" - who by the way - will reap the blessings of being a "finder. James Strong, a professor of exegetical theology in the 19th century, Strong's Exhaustive Concordance books have been used by students and professors alike for quicker, more in depth study of the Bible and passages. It may not be the most accurate, but it is the most elegant. The point Paul is making, then, is this: Men and women tested the idea of God and having concluded that he would destroy their freedom after all, he is the powerful Creator who has a legitimate claim on all his creation made the conscious choice to dispel him from their thinking , cited: A Bilingual Concordance to the Targum of the Prophets: Kings I Bilingual Concordance to the Targum of the Prophets A Bilingual Concordance to the Targum of.
Their dominating influence on the revision committee of accounts for most of the corruption that we have today in modern translations. The Bible believer should keep several points in mind when discussing these two men , e. This is an exhaustive concordance based on the best-selling New International Version of the Bible. Translations and manuscripts.
Biblical studies. Hermeneutics Pesher Midrash Pardes. Allegorical interpretation Literalism. Gnostic Islamic Qur'anic. Inerrancy Infallibility. Main article: Vetus Latina. A grammar of the Vulgate, being an introduction to the study of the latinity of the Vulgate Bible. Oxford: Clarendon Press. The Journal of Theological Studies. Chapman, John Revue Benedictine. In Brown, William P. Oxford Handbook to the Psalms. Oxford University Press. Nautin and perhaps E. Burstein , suggest that Jerome may have been almost wholly dependent on Greek material for his interpretation of the Hebrew.
Kamesar , on the other hand, sees evidence that in some cases Jerome's knowledge of Hebrew exceeds that of his exegetes, implying a direct understanding of the Hebrew text. Clarendon Press, Oxford, This work cites E. Retrieved 26 June Robert Weber, Roger Gryson eds. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft. Our Bible and the Ancient Manuscripts 4th ed. Retrieved Jerome: The Principal Works of St. Jerome - Christian Classics Ethereal Library". De Bruyne has made one of the finest discoveries of later days in proving that those prefaces, which we read first in Codex Fuldensis and then in numbers of later manuscripts, are Marcionite, and that the Churches had not noticed the cloven hoof.
The text of the New Testament in Contemporary Research; 2nd edn. In Brown, William. Oxford Handbook of the Psalms. In Dorfbauer, Lukas J. Fortunatianus ridivivus. The Bible in English: its history and influence. New Haven: Yale University Press. Retrieved May 16, National Catholic Register. How to correct the Sacra scriptura? Textual criticism of the Latin Bible between the twelfth and fifteenth century. Spiritual Writings. Paulist Press. II, Rev. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Biblia Sacra iuxta Vulgatam Clementinam. Biblioteca de autores cristianos 14 13 ed. Madrid: Biblioteca de autores cristianos.
Novum Testamentum graece et latine. Berlin: Reimer. Cum variantibus in margine lectionibus antiquissimi et praestantissimi codicis olim monasterii Montis Amiatae in Etruria, nunc bibliothecae Florentinae Laurentianae Mediceae saec. Praemissa est commentatio de codice Amiatino et versione latina vulgata". Sumtibus et Typis C.
Retrieved 26 June — via Google Books. Novum Testamentum Latine: textum Vaticanum cum apparatu critico ex editionibus et libris manu scriptis collecto imprimendum. The Classical Review. The Oxford critical edition of the Vulgate New Testament. Life of Bishop John Wordsworth. London: Longmans, Green. John Wordsworth, Henry Julian White eds. CS1 maint: others link 3 vols. Ramsbotham and the Oxford Vulgate". Matthew, B. Harrison eds. The Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Abbott, T.
Houghton Retrieved 5 June Pontifical Abbey of St Jerome-in-the-City ed. Rome: Libreria Editrice Vaticana. CS1 maint: others link 18 vols. The Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. Liber Hiesu Filii Sirach". Liber psalmorum ex recensione sancti Hieronymi cum praefationibus et epistula ad Sunniam et Fretelam". Vatican: The Holy See. Retrieved 19 December Libreria Editrice Vaticana. Retrieved 9 November Novae concordantiae bibliorum sacrorum iuxta Vulgatam versionem critice editam. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog. Meyvaert, Paul; Serge Lusignan Kilpatrick, G.
The text with apparatus is published through Accordance which also makes available a version of the text without the apparatus and Logos. Zur Gestaltung des Textes". Biblische Zeitschrift. April Catholic Biblical Quarterly. Kurt Aland, Barbara Aland eds. CS1 maint: others link. Stuttgart Vulgate. Catholic Church. Index Outline Lists of Catholics. Lateran Treaty Index Outline. Catholicism portal Book Category. History of Catholic theology. Key figures. Constantine to Pope Gregory I. Reformation Counter-Reformation.
Baroque period to French Revolution. Catholicism portal. History of the Catholic Church. Reformation Catholic Reformation. Baroque Period to the French Revolution. Vatican City portal Catholicism portal. Books of the Bible. Catholic Orthodox. Letter of Baruch Psalms — Category Portal WikiProject Book. Namespaces Article Talk.
Full text of "The comprehensive concordance to the Holy Scriptures"
Translation studies Skopos theory Translation project Translation criticism Dynamic and formal equivalence Contrastive linguistics. Glocalization Internationalization and localization Language localisation Game localization Dub localization. Associations Awards Organizations Schools. Contents Custodian Name A. Bible ex Cath. Sam — Kings. Municipal Lib. Russian National Lib. Trinity College, Dublin. Deut — Ruth. National Lib. Gen — Num. Acts Cath Rev. Ezra — Job. Cathedral Lib. State Lib. Tobit — Job. City Lib. See also List of New Testament Latin manuscripts.
Wisdom ; Cath. Paul ; Hebrews.
Related Horned To Idols - Digital Concordance Book 44 (Digital Concordance Of The Bible)
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved